HIGHLIGHTS:
CASE SUMMARY:
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that the fintech company violated the MLA when it imposed membership fees on borrowers which, when combined with loan-interest-rate charges, exceeded the MLA's annual percentage rate cap. Further, the Bureau alleges that the company violated the MLA by inserting an illegal arbitration provision in the contracts and by failing to make the requisite disclosures to borrowers. The complaint also alleges that the company deceived consumers by misrepresenting that borrowers owed loan payments and fees that were not actually owed because the alleged MLA violations made the loans void from inception.
Regarding the membership fees, the Bureau alleges that the company engaged in unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices because it did not permit borrowers to exit the membership program and stop monthly membership fees. The Bureau claims this misrepresented the borrowers' right to cancel the memberships for any reason because the restriction on cancellation was not clearly disclosed when borrowers took out loans. The Bureau alleges that this practice was also unfair and abusive. The complaint seeks redress for consumers, injunctive relief, and a civil money penalty. The complaint is not a final finding or ruling that the company violated the law.
Resources:
You can review all of the relevant court filings and press releases here.
Lucy E. Morris is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Hudson Cook, LLP. She can be reached at 202.327.9710 or by email at lmorris@hudco.com. Michael C. Essiaw is an associate in the Washington D.C. office of Hudson Cook, LLP. He can be reached at 202.715.2009 or by email at messiaw@hudoc.com.
Copyright © 2025 CounselorLibrary.com, LLC. All rights reserved.